Everything Hertz

Dan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases? Here's an episode overview and links to stuff we mentioned: We’re a pop science podcast, apparently Elizabeth Bik’s wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisabeth_Bik) Elizabeth’s Patreon page (https://www.patreon.com/elisabethbik) The original consortium letter (https://presspage-production-content.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/1508/coalitionletteropposinglowerembargoes-864869.pdf?54750) The apology letter (https://www.psychologicalscience.org/policy/to-aps-members-from-the-board-of-directors.html) from the APS The “love of science (https://twitter.com/NobelPrize/status/1219530825320083456?s=20)” tweet How James got into science Tal’s “science is not a jobs program (https://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/960296870080925696?s=20)” tweet The 'Should research misconduct be criminalised? (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/174701